Back to Growth Toolbox
Data Enrichment

Icypeas

In my top 2 for waterfall workflows with Enrow thanks to very good discoverability. Data quality is excellent for email enrichment. It's an essential tool in my stack if you do enrichment seriously.

Try the tool
Who's it for?OpsGrowth

Review by a Growth Engineer

My verdict: in my top 2 for email enrichment, essential in my stack.

In my top 2 for waterfall workflows (with Enrow). Very good discoverability and excellent data quality.

It's an essential tool in my stack. If you're looking for pure performance in email discovery, go for it.

What I like less: the interface is a bit less modern than some competitors. But for what it does, that's secondary.

My advice: if you do email enrichment, test Icypeas. Combined with Enrow in a waterfall, it's formidable.

Why add it to your stack?

Icypeas is in my top 2 email enrichment tools with Enrow. Discoverability is excellent — it finds emails that others miss. Data quality delivers.

In my waterfall workflows, Icypeas is often in first or second position. The API integrates perfectly into n8n. It's an essential tool in my enrichment stack.

What you can do with it

  • 1First or second source in an enrichment waterfall
  • 2Find hard-to-discover emails
  • 3Verify and clean an email database before campaign
  • 4Automate enrichment in your n8n/Make workflows
  • 5Batch enrichment via file or API

What it does

  • Professional email enrichment
  • Integrated email verification
  • REST API for workflows
  • Google Sheets integration
  • Bulk enrichment by file
  • Webhooks for automations

How much?

Starting at 49 euros/month

Plans starting at 49 euros/month for 1000 credits. Plans with larger volumes available. Credit rollover on some plans.

The detailed verdict

Do I really need this?

In my stack, Icypeas is essential. It's one of my two go-to tools for email enrichment. Quality and discoverability justify this position.

If you do enrichment seriously, Icypeas must be in your waterfall.

Does it play nice with my stack?

The API is excellent — simple, well-documented, responsive. Integration into n8n or Make is straightforward. Webhooks enable asynchronous workflows.

It's designed for ops profiles who automate.

Is it easy to pick up?

Quick to get started. Upload a file, launch enrichment, retrieve results. The interface is intuitive for basic cases.

The API requires a few minutes of configuration but the documentation is clear.

Is the UX any good?

The interface is functional without being exceptional. The dashboard does the job, enrichment is simple to launch. It's less polished than Clay, but more focused.

UX isn't the strong point, but it's sufficient for daily use.

Is it worth it?

Value for money is excellent. For what it finds — emails that others miss — the pricing is justified. Credit rollover on some plans avoids waste.

It's one of the best value-for-money ratios on the email enrichment market.

What I like

  • Excellent in waterfall workflows in first or second position
  • Discoverability of hard-to-find emails is a strong point
  • Data quality is excellent especially on the European market

What I like less

  • Not much to criticize if you're looking for pure email
  • The interface is a bit less modern than some competitors
  • But for what it does, design is secondary

Need more details or help building your ideal stack?

Visit official siteGet advice