Back to Growth Toolbox
Browser

ChatGPT Atlas

OpenAI's AI browser with great promises on paper for a browser that understands the web. Unfortunately, the execution is not yet up to par with too many bugs and failures. Too unstable for daily use in its current state.

Try the tool
Who's it for?Solopreneur

Review by a Growth Engineer

My verdict: great promises, but too buggy for daily use.

Atlas promises a lot on paper: an AI browser that truly understands the web and can act on it. The idea is revolutionary.

But in use, it's full of bugs. I stopped using it. The execution isn't yet up to par for a daily driver. Too much friction.

What I like less: reliability is catastrophic. Actions fail regularly, pages don't load, results are unpredictable.

My advice: test it out of curiosity if you have ChatGPT Plus (it's included), but don't rely on it for serious tasks. Wait a few iterations before integrating it into your stack.

Why add it to your stack?

On paper, Atlas is exciting: a browser that truly understands the web, can extract data, and automate actions. It's the future of browsing.

But in practice, it's too buggy for daily use. The idea is good, the execution isn't up to par yet. I stopped using it - too much friction.

What you can do with it

  • 1Search and synthesize information across multiple pages
  • 2Extract structured data from websites
  • 3Automate repetitive web tasks (when it works)
  • 4Navigate and interact with complex pages
  • 5Summarize web articles or documents

What it does

  • AI-assisted web navigation
  • Contextual page understanding
  • Automated web actions
  • Native ChatGPT integration
  • Research and data extraction
  • Web content synthesis

How much?

Starting at $20/month

Included in ChatGPT Plus ($20/month). Feature in beta, gradual access.

The detailed verdict

Do I really need this?

Atlas is not at all indispensable in its current state. For web research, classic ChatGPT with browsing does the job. For web automation, tools like Apify or Playwright are more reliable.

It's a beta feature, not a mature tool. Keep an eye on it for the future, but don't make it a pillar of your stack.

Does it play nice with my stack?

Integrations are limited. It's a feature built into ChatGPT, not a standalone product. No dedicated API, no webhooks, no way to automate.

For serious web automation workflows, dedicated tools (Apify, Puppeteer) remain far superior.

Is it easy to pick up?

In theory, it's simple: you ask the AI to navigate and act on the web. In practice, failures are frequent, and you often have to take over manually.

The learning curve isn't the problem - it's the reliability that's lacking.

Is the UX any good?

The user experience is frustrating. Bugs are frequent, actions often fail, pages don't load correctly. The interface promises a lot but delivers little.

The concept is well thought out, but the execution doesn't match. Hopefully it improves over time.

Is it worth it?

If you already pay for ChatGPT Plus, Atlas is included - so the marginal cost is zero. But the delivered value is low given the bugs. You can't rely on it for serious tasks.

As a free experimental feature, it's acceptable. As a productivity tool, not yet.

What I like

  • Curious early adopters wanting to test the future of AI-assisted web navigation
  • Assisted research for exploratory tasks without critical stakes
  • Users who want to experiment with OpenAI's new beta features

What I like less

  • Daily use as bugs are too frequent to be productive
  • Tasks that require reliability and predictable results
  • Those who want a stable browser for serious work

Need more details or help building your ideal stack?

Visit official siteGet advice